ਵਰਤੋਂਕਾਰ ਗੱਲ-ਬਾਤ:Itar buttar/Archive 2

ਇਹ ਪਿਛਲੀ ਗੱਲ-ਬਾਤ ਦਾ ਸਾਂਭਿਆ ਹੋਇਆ ਰਿਕਾਰਡ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਸਫ਼ੇ ਵਿਚ ਫੇਰ-ਬਦਲ ਨਾ ਕਰੋ। ਜੇ ਤੁਸੀਂ ਨਵੀਂ ਚਰਚਾ ਸ਼ੁਰੂ ਕਰਨਾ ਚਾਹੁੰਦੇ ਹੋ ਜਾਂ ਕਿਸੇ ਪੁਰਾਣੀ ਚਾਰਚਾ ਨੂੰ ਫੇਰ ਤੋਂ ਛੇੜਨਾ ਚਾਹੁੰਦੇ ਹੋ ਤਾਂ ਮੌਜੂਦਾ ਗੱਲ-ਬਾਤ ਸਫ਼ੇ ’ਤੇ ਲਿਖੋ।

ਬਾਬਾ ਹਰੀਰਾਮ ਬਾਰੇ[ਸੋਧੋ]

ਬਾਬਾ ਹਰੀਰਾਮ ਜਿੰਦਾ ਇਨਸਾਨ ਨਹੀਂ ਸਗੋਂ ਇੱਕ ਮਰ ਚੁੱਕੇ ਲੋਕ ਦੇਵਤਾ ਹਨ।
ਬਾਬਾ ਹਰੀਰਾਮ ਬਾਰੇ ਹਿੰਦੀ ਅਤੇ ਰਾਜਸਥਾਨੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਨਾਂਅ ਸਹੀ ਹੈ ਕਿਉਕਿ ਉਹਨਾ ਨਾਲ ਇਹਨਾ ਭਾਸ਼ਾਵਾ ਦਾ ਸੰਬਧ ਹੈ ਨਾਕਿ ਇਗਲਿਸ਼ ਦਾ।
Indian state of Rajasthan has reach tradition of folk gods.Many of them are already recorded in wikipedia for exmaple Ramdevji Guru Jambheshwar Pabujiand many more.As far as Baba Hariram is concerned,it is also one of the great or important folk dieties or folk gods because
1 Qeustions about BABA HARIRAM is frequently asked in exams conducted by pretigious RAJASTHAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION of RAJASTHAN GOVERNMENT.It means this article covers a important encyclopaedic topic.(however it is now a stub)
2 Baba Hariram is not living now but people of various states worships them.
3 District website of Nagaur,RAJASTHAN GOVERNMENT also puts light on Baba Hariram,in following link of this website,provides reliable information under title JHORDA ,the birthplace of this folk diety. http://nagaur.nic.in/tourism.htm

Hence above points prove it a encyclopaedic topic and requested not to be deleted.SivenderSM (talk) ੦੯:੩੪, ੨੫ ਅਗਸਤ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

ਲੇਖ ਮਿਸਲ ਅਤੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਮਿਸਲਾਂ ਬਾਰੇ |[ਸੋਧੋ]

ਅੱਗੇ ਲਿਖੇ ਦੋਹਾਂ ਲੇਖਾਂ 'ਤੇ ਇਕ ਝਾਤ ਜਰੂਰ ਮਾਰਿਓ| ਮਿਸਲ ਅਤੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਮਿਸਲਾਂ ..ਦੋਨਾਂ 'ਚੋਂ ਇਕ ਬਣਾ ਦੇਣਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਹੈ|--ਸੰਧੂ | kJ (talk) ੦੦:੪੫, ੨੮ ਅਗਸਤ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

ਜੀ ਹਾਂ ਕੁਲਜੀਤ, ਤੁਸੀਂ ਮਿਸਲ ਲੇਖ ਵਿਚ "ਸਿੱਖ ਮਿਸਲਾਂ" ਸੈਕਸ਼ਨ ਬਣਾ ਕੇ ਇਹਨਾਂ ਲੇਖਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਰਲ਼ਾਉਣ ਵਿਚ ਮਦਦ ਕਰ ਸਕਦੇ ਹੋ। ਇਸ ਨਾਲ਼ ਲੇਖ ਕਾਫ਼ੀ ਵੱਡਾ ਅਤੇ ਉੱਨਤ ਵੀ ਲੱਗੇਗਾ। Tari Buttar ੧੨:੦੫, ੩੧ ਅਗਸਤ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

ਬਜ਼ੁਰਗਾਂ ਦੀ ਸੰਭਾਲ ਲੇਖ[ਸੋਧੋ]

This topic is of great importance as is interest shown in other wikipedias like german ,english and other languages. In indian context since as per our values family is taking care but at the same time other concerns like care by state has started becoming relevant.Of course full article will develop with passage of time and with more contributors in punjabi wikipedia but article as such may be of help to for indian policy makers to find sources of other countries link where they can study their policies in this regard that too in punjabi.By the way what is so unencyclopedic as per 5 pillars of wiki in it which made you to delete the article in few hours of its creation.Is it not scuttling buds or shoots on punjabi wikipedia?--Guglani (talk) ੧੭:੨੦, ੩੦ ਅਗਸਤ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

ਉਹ ਮੈਂ ਸਿਰਫ਼ ਤਾਂ ਬਣਾਇਆ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਮੈਂਬਰ ਉਸਨੂੰ ਪੜ੍ਹ ਕੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਲੇਖ ਚ ਸੁਧਾਰ ਕਰਨ ਵੱਲ ਜ਼ਿਆਦਾ ਧਿਆਨ ਦੇਣ। ਮੈਂ ਵਿਕੀ ਦੀ ਮੌਜੂਦਾ ਹਾਲਤ ਜਣਦਾ ਹਾਂ ਅਤੇ ਇਸੇ ਕਰਕੇ ਮੈਂ ਉਹਨਾਂ ਪੰਜ ਥੰਮਾਂ ਦੇ ਅਸੂਲ, ਅਤੇ ਹੋਰ ਜਿੰਨੀਆਂ ਵੀ ਨੀਤੀਆਂ ਤੇ ਅਸੂਲ ਮੈਂ ਲਿਖੇ ਨੇ, ਨੂੰ ਕਦੇ ਵੀ ਸਖ਼ਤੀ ਨਾਲ਼ ਲਾਗੂ ਨਹੀਂ ਕੀਤਾ। ਇਹ ਹਾਲੇ ਤਾਂ ਸਿਰਫ਼ ਮੈਂਬਰਾਂ ਦੀ ਮੁੱਢਲੀ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਲਈ ਹੈ ਤਾਂ ਕਿ ਬੁਨਿਆਦ ਹੀ ਚੰਗੀ ਹੋਵੇ। but sorry to see you not developing/improving articles in wiki sense. Just seen you defending/protecting your own articles being deleted etc. every time. Even after my much detailed analysis, didn't see you making any efforts in developing/improving them. And can you please provide a link to english and other wikis regarding ਬਜ਼ੁਰਗਾਂ ਦੀ ਸੰਭਾਲ? Tari Buttar ੦੧:੧੮, ੩੧ ਅਗਸਤ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Please see within wiki links on left side of article for german,english,japanese,finnish,thai,one more http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%84ldreomsorg --Guglani (talk) ੦੫:੩੦, ੩੧ ਅਗਸਤ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

I see the topic being unclear on en.wiki. So, I suggest you to add reliable inline citations for such unclear topic and please avoid wikis, facebook, blogs and own websites as sources. Before tagging it to be unreferenced, I'll wait for you to add some. Also, please improve your other articles accordingly and I'm always here helping you. Being an admin your articles should be an example of quality and style for others. Really pleased with your efforts. :-) ! Tari Buttar ੧੧:੫੮, ੩੧ ਅਗਸਤ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

ਸੂਮਰ[ਸੋਧੋ]

ਇਹ ਪੇਜ ਡਿਲੀਟ (delete) ਨਾ ਕਰੋ, ਮੈਂ ਇਸ ਉੱਪਰ ਕੰਮ ਕਰ ਰਿਹਾ ਹਾਂ। Bhvintri (ਗੱਲ-ਬਾਤ) ੦੦:੩੬, ੩੧ ਅਗਸਤ ੨੦੧੨ (IST)

ਜਵਾਬ ਲਈ ਆਪਣਾ ਗੱਲ-ਬਾਤ/ਚਰਚਾ ਸਫ਼ਾ ਵੇਖੋ। Tari Buttar ੦੧:੨੩, ੩੧ ਅਗਸਤ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

ਫ਼ੋਟੋ ਦੇ ਸਾਈਜ ਬਾਰੇ[ਸੋਧੋ]

ਸ:ਸ:ਅਆ ਜੀ ਮੈਂ ਜਾਨਣਾ ਚਾਹੁੰਦਾ ਹਾਂ ਕਿ ਕੀ ਇੱਕ ਲੇਖ ਵਿੱਚ ਵਡੇ ਸਾਈਜ ਵਾਲੀ ਫੋਟੋ ਲਗਾਉਣੀ ਸਹੀ ਹੈ? ਜਿਵੇਂ ਮੈਂ ਆਪਣੇ ਲੇਖ ਇੰਦਰਾ ਗਾਂਧੀ ਨਹਿਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਤਸਵੀਰ:Indira Gandhi Canal.jpg ਲਗਾਈ ਹੈ। SivenderSM (talk) ੦੮:੫੧, ੩੧ ਅਗਸਤ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

ਲੇਖ/ਸਫ਼ੇ ਵਿਚ ਤਸਵੀਰ ਦਾ ਨਮੂਨਾ (thumbnail) ਹੀ ਵਰਤਣਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਹੈ ਨਹੀਂ ਤਾਂ ਵਿਕੀ ਲੇਖ ਕੋਈ ਗੈਲਰੀ ਲੱਗੇਗਾ ਅਤੇ ਵਿਕੀ ਲੇਖ ਗੈਲਰੀਆਂ ਲਈ ਨਹੀਂ ਹਨ। ਕਿਰਪਾ ਕਰਕੇ ਨਮੂਨਾ ਹੀ ਵਰਤੋ, ਜੇ ਵੱਡਾ ਸਾਈਜ਼ ਹੀ ਵਰਤਣਾ ਹੈ ਤਾਂ 250px ਵਰਤ ਲਓ ਅਤੇ ਇੰਦਰਾ ਗਾਂਧੀ ਨਹਿਰ ਵਾਲ਼ੀ ਫ਼ੋਟੋ ਦਾ ਸਾਈਜ਼ ਵੀ ਸੁਧਾਰੋ। ਫ਼ੋਟੋ ਤੇ ਕਲਿੱਕ ਕਰਕੇ ਵੱਡੀ ਫ਼ੋਟੋ ਵੇਖਣ ਵਾਲ਼ੀ ਸਹੂਲਤ ਤੋਂ ਸਭ ਵਾਕਫ਼ ਹਨ। ਸੋ ਸਫ਼ਿਆਂ ਵਿਚ ਤਸਵੀਰ ਦਾ ਨਮੂਨਾ ਹੀ ਵਰਤੋ। Tari Buttar ੧੦:੨੦, ੩੧ ਅਗਸਤ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

ਧੰਨਵਾਦ[ਸੋਧੋ]

ਕੰਮ ਸਲਾਹੁਣ ਲਈ ਸ਼ੁਕਰੀਆ,ਉੱਮੀਦ ਹੈ ਅੱਗੇ ਵੀ ਮਾਰਗਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਕਰਦੇ ਰਹੋਗੇ ਜੀ! SivenderSM (talk) ੧੫:੨੫, ੩੧ ਅਗਸਤ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

ਟੂ ਸਟੈਟਸ ਬਾਰੇ[ਸੋਧੋ]

ਤੁਸੀਂ ਟੂ ਸਟੈਟਸ ਲੇਖ ਵਿੱਚ ਕਥਾ ਸਾਰ ਦੇ ਵਿਸਥਾਰ ਨੂੰ ਬੇਲੋੜਾ ਕਹਿ ਰਹੇ ਹੋ, ਜੇ ਇਹਨਾਂ ਬੇਲੋੜਾ ਹੈ ਤਾਂ ਇਹ ਪਾਠਕ ਨੂੰ ਕੀ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਦੇਵੇਗਾ। ਏਡੀਟ ਬਾਅਦ ਬਚੇ ਅੰਸ਼ ਬਾਰੇ ਤਾਂ ਵੈਸੇ ਵੀ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਹੁੰਦੀ ਹੈ। ਵਿਸਥਾਰ ਹੀ ਪੂਰੀ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਦਿੰਦਾ ਹੈ। ਇੰਗਲਿਸ਼ ਵਿਕਿਪੀਡਿਆ ਤੇ ਇਹ ਸਾਰਾ ਕਿੰਨੇ ਵਿਸਥਾਰ ਨਾਲ ਹੈ। ਕੀ ਉਹ ਗਲਤ ਹੈ ? ਕਿਰਪਾ ਕਰਕੇ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਸੱਮਗਰੀ ਵਧ੍ਣ ਦਿਓ,ਘਟਾਓ ਨਹੀਂ। ਇਸੇ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਤੁਸੀਂ ਮਾਉਂਟ ਆਬੂ ਲੇਖ ਵਿੱਚ 'ਆਉਣ ਜਾਣ ਲਈਈ ਸਾਧਨ ਵਾਲਾ ਸੈਕਸ਼ਨ ਹਟਾ ਦਿੱਤਾ। ਜੇ ਤੁਸੀਂ ਹਟਾਉਣ ਦੀ ਥਾਂ ਸੁਆਰਦੇ ਤਾਂ ਜਿਆਦਾ ਬੇਹਤਰ ਸੀ! SivenderSM (talk) ੧੬:੨੫, ੩੧ ਅਗਸਤ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

ਨਹੀਂ, ਮੇਰੇ ਸ਼ੁਰੂਆਤੀ ਦਿਨਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਵੀ ਮੇਰੀ ਅਜਿਹੀ ਲਿਖਤ, wiki is not a tourist guide ਕਹਿ ਕੇ ਹਟਾ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਗਈ ਸੀ। ਅਜਿਹਾ ਕੋਈ ਸੈਕਸ਼ਨ ਥਾਂ ਜਾਂ ਇਮਾਰਤ ਵਾਲ਼ੇ ਲੇਖ ਚ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੋਣਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ। ਅਤੇ ਰਹੀ ਗੱਲ ਤਫ਼ਸੀਲ ਵਿਚ ਲਿਖੀ ਕਹਾਣੀ ਦੀ। ਤੁਸੀਂ ਸੌਖੀ ਅਤੇ ਸੰਖ਼ੇਪ (ਜ਼ਿਆਦਾ ਲਾਈਨਾਂ ਦੀ ਲਿਖਤ ਨੂੰ ਇਕ ਲਾਈਨ ਵਿਚ ਪਰੋ ਕੇ ਲਿਖਣ ਦੀ ਕੋਸ਼ਿਸ਼ ਕਰੋ) ਬੋਲੀ ਦੀ ਵਰਤੋਂ ਕਰਕੇ ਲਿਖ ਸਕਦੇ ਹੋ। ਅਤੇ ਕਿਰਪਾ ਕਰਕੇ ਅਪ੍ਰਵਾਨਗੀ, ਪ੍ਰਸਤਾਵ, ਉਪੰਨਿਆਸ ਵਰਗੇ ਹਿੰਦੀ ਸ਼ਬਦਾਂ ਦੀ ਥਾਂ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਦੇ ਲਫ਼ਜ਼ ਵਰਤੋ। ਕਈ ਵਾਰ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ ਦਾ ਕੋਈ ਲਫ਼ਜ਼ ਵੀ ਜ਼ਿਆਦਾ ਵਧੀਆ ਹੋ ਨਿੱਬੜਦਾ ਹੈ। Tari Buttar ੧੬:੪੭, ੩੧ ਅਗਸਤ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Deleting a redirect[ਸੋਧੋ]

Hi,

You moved the page ਰਬਿੰਦਰਨਾਥ ਟੈਗੋਰ without leaving a redirect. Usually you shouldn't do this, even if the old name is a mistake. Now ਰਵੀੰਦ੍ਰਨਾਥ ਠਾਕੁਰ is a red link, and there is at least on page that links to it. Don't delete the redirect even after you fix all the links, because old versions of the pages still have the old link and they must be usable. There can also be links from other sites to Wikipedia using the old name.

Redirects are created automatically for a good reason. Don't delete them. And please restore the ਰਵੀੰਦ੍ਰਨਾਥ ਠਾਕੁਰ redirect. Thank you. --ਅਮੀਰ ਏਲਿਸ਼ਾ ਅਹਰੋਨਿ / Amir E. Aharoni (talk)

First of all, welcome back. Then, I wanna say that it has the wrong spelling if you still want it to be exist for some goodness, please create it as the redirect. You better know how to do it :-) . But I think the wrongly spelled should not exist (fixing all links-to-them to the right one) specially titles with big spelling mistakes. May be you don't know that Gurmukhi is much complex script to be rightly typed. Mistakes must be removed. Anyway it all yours. Thanks for being here. --tari Buttar (talk) ੧੬:੧੦, ੩ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

I understand that it's a mistake, but you must not delete the redirect. If you move the page, people will only see the new name, so the mistake will essentially disappear. The redirect is needed to make sure that the old links work. --ਅਮੀਰ ਏਲਿਸ਼ਾ ਅਹਰੋਨਿ / Amir E. Aharoni (talk) ੧੬:੧੩, ੩ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

okay then! please create it and I want to move it further for a little correction. Should I leave a redirect behind this time also? tari Buttar (talk) ੧੬:੨੧, ੩ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

I created a redirect. See my contributions. You should know how to do this yourself.

And yes, you should always leave redirects. When you move a page, just leave the redirect checkbox checked. Uncheck it only if you have a very special reason. This is almost never needed. --ਅਮੀਰ ਏਲਿਸ਼ਾ ਅਹਰੋਨਿ / Amir E. Aharoni (talk) ੧੬:੨੪, ੩ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

thanks for your contribution and yes, no doubt, I know it better. tari Buttar (talk) ੧੬:੨੮, ੩ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Please check on Hindi, Marathi articles, the name I create is correct name. You are wrong. Same with Jhansi ki rani, there must be a redirect just like in Hindi and English language Wikipedia. Thanks you. --ਰਾਜੇਨ੍ਦ੍ਰ ਸਿੰਘ (talk) ੧੩:੧੬, ੪ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Please don't get personal. The word ਝਾਂਸੀ never contains a tippi as you said it to be correct. Tippi never used with/on the kanna, is a grammatical rule. ਝਾਂਸੀ is always correct. But please avoid personal research, wiki is not for this and also, don't use titles translated from any other wiki; try to spell it in Punjabi manually. If someone corrected it don't get personal. Thanks. --tari Buttar (talk) ੧੪:੧੮, ੪ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

you are say for me not to get personal, while you are teaching me to spell my name? ਰਾਜੇਨ੍ਦ੍ਰ ਸਿੰਘ (talk) ੧੮:੧੬, ੪ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Because you used a halant character that is not used is names in Punjabi and your name is also very common so every Punjabi knowns how it is spelled. I just mentioned a mis-typing in your name nothing else. Not only this, from your writing style it is clear that you don't know Punjabi better that also, has been pointed you out by another user, earlier. I know the Punjabi better so I told you about the spelling mistakes. But you, in case of typing Punjabi, have your own opinions and mixing lots of other language's words with Punjabi, may be this is just the result of the translation resources you use. Here, on wiki, it's easy to correct a mistake that you don't letting others do saying your works to be always correct. Please upgrade your resources and, as I told you before, never use copy-translate method that mostly do grammatical mistakes of that type; you can discuss it better with other native Punjabis if you are not agree with me in spellings. But always remain civil and polite to them as only this type of behaviour is acceptable on wiki. --tari Buttar (talk) ੦੦:੫੫, ੫ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

as I have telling you my name is not Rajender, it's Rajendra but leave this, you know your name I know mine. But for the words ਝਾੰਸੀ, I am see bindi not tippi. if there is tippi then you correct. and I give you manner aplogees for if you found attitude problems. --ਰਾਜੇਨ੍ਦ੍ਰ ਸਿੰਘ (talk) ੧੯:੫੦, ੫ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Good Job[ਸੋਧੋ]

I've seen you doing translations from mediawiki for pawiki. You are doing such great work. Keep it up!!!--ਸੰਧੂ | kJ (talk) ੧੫:੦੮, ੧੩ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Thanks for encouraging, kJ! If you find any to be done or any other you can't (or unable to) edit, please let me know. --tari Buttar (talk) ੧੫:੧੩, ੧੩ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Languages on the ਮੁੱਖ ਸਫ਼ਾ[ਸੋਧੋ]

Hello Tari,

I kindly request that you add the Shahmukhi Wiki to the list of other Wikis on our front page. I believe I am unable to make this edit myself due to not being an Admin.

Thank you,

Ihaveacomputer (talk) ੧੪:੫੪, ੧੪ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

done; thanks for pointing out. --tari Buttar (talk) ੧੬:੧੧, ੧੪ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

ਸਹੀ ਹਿੱਜਾ[ਸੋਧੋ]

੧-ਕਿਰਪਾ ਕਰਕੇ ਦੱਸੋ ਕਿ ਇਸ ਵਿਕਿ ਉੱਤੇ ਕਿਹੜਾ ਢੰਗ ਸਹੀ ਸਮਝਿਆ ਜਾਵੇਗਾ : ਭੂਗੋਲਕ ਜਾਂ ਭੂਗੋਲਿਕ, ਆਰਥਕ ਜਾਂ ਆਰਥਿਕ ਆਦਿ ?? ੨-ਇਸ ਸਫ਼ੇ ਉੱਤੇ ਯੂਜ਼ਰ ਦੀ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ "ਵਰਤੌਂਕਾਰ" ਆ ਰਹੀ ਹੈ ਜੋ ਕਿ ਅਸਲ ਵਿੱਚ "ਵਰਤੋਂਕਾਰ" ਹੋਣੀ ਚਾਹੀਦੀ ਹੈ। ਕਿਰਪਾ ਕਰਕੇ ਧਿਆਨ ਦੇਣਾ। ਧੰਨਵਾਦ। --Babanwalia (talk) ੦੯:੨੨, ੧੬ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

੧ ਕਿਰਪਾ ਪੂਰਵਕ ਬਰਾਦਰੀ ਪਿੜ ਤੇ spellings ਸਿਰਲੇਖ ਤੇ ਹੋ ਰਹੀ ਵਾਰਤਾਲਾਪ ਪੜ੍ਹ ਕੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਵਿਚਾਰ ਪ੍ਰਗਟਾਓ।

੨ ਤੁਹਾਡੇ ਸੁਝਾਅ ਲਈ ਧੰਨਵਾਦ ਛੇਤੀ ਹੀ ਵਰਤੋਂਕਾਰ ਸਬਦ ਸੁਧਾਰ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਜਾਵੇਗਾ ਕਿਉਂਕਿ user ਦੀ ਟਰਾਂਸਲੇਸ਼ਨ ਸੁਧਾਰਨ ਨਾਲ ਜੋ ਮੇਰੇ ਦੁਆਰਾ ਕੀਤੀ ਗਈ ਹੇ, ਇਹ ਸੰਭਵ ਹੋ ਸਕੇਗਾ।Guglani (talk) ੧੧:੩੦, ੧੬ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Thanks!

I think for ਭੂਗੋਲਕ ਜਾਂ ਭੂਗੋਲਿਕ and ਆਰਥਕ ਜਾਂ ਆਰਥਿਕ, the current open talk on the community portal is better. It must discussed there and also ਦਿਹਾਂਤ.
I fixed the translation of "user" just after you but may it take some time to come into action. --tari Buttar (talk) ੧੨:੫੦, ੧੬ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Errors and typos at certain pages[ਸੋਧੋ]

Seeing how you care for the most authentic "Punjabi" for many a words, which I appreciate, I'd like to bring into your notice certain errors in the "recent changes" page where "ਪਰ" has been used in lieu of "ਉੱਤੇ" plus a typo. Please correct this asap as well as I've been unable to notice any change in the spellings of "user" in response to the request I made earlier. Thanks!--Babanwalia (talk) ੧੩:੧੮, ੨੧ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Thanks for your concern. I'm also noticing "ਪਰ" for a long time. Anyway, working on it; 'll be solved soon.

And, please explain, what request you're talking about? and where you made it? --tari Buttar (talk) ੧੩:੩੫, ੨੧ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

I'm talking about the request made in the topic just preceding this one on the same page where I talked about the error in the word "ਵਰਤੌਂਕਾਰ" which you said would be fixed soon.--Babanwalia (talk) ੧੩:੫੯, ੨੧ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Oh, just checked the page history and found it was you to start the topic. I taken it to be written by Guglani as was signed. Please sign with your own signatures using four ~~~~, never removed your signature as you did here. Please be careful in the future.

As of translation, I've fixed it at the interface (I think soon after the wrong one). May it take some time to come to action. --tari Buttar (talk) ੧੪:੨੪, ੨੧ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

done: the "ਪਰ" issue on recent changes page has been fixed. Thanks for reminding. --tari Buttar (talk) ੧੭:੪੯, ੨੧ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Thanks a lot.--Babanwalia (talk) ੦੦:੦੬, ੨੨ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

good content[ਸੋਧੋ]

Hi TariButtar! Can you tell me if the Punjabi wiki has some good articles that can be fetured on the main page? >>Zarienah (talk) ੧੮:੧੭, ੨੨ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Glad to see you deeper interest in the wiki. I think a featured article is to be found yet, please help finding the articles that are good in almost every sense or help making them good. Have you found any? Also, thanks a lot for the star. --tari Buttar (talk) ੦੧:੨੯, ੨੩ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Let's start listing out: ਮਨੁੱਖੀ ਸਰੀਰ, ਮਨੁੱਖੀ ਅੱਖ, ਭਾਰਤ ਦਾ ਝੰਡਾ(needs improvement), ਜੈਵਿਕ ਖੇਤੀ . There's many more articles that are although small in content but are written in good article style. keep lookin'--ਸੰਧੂ | kJ (talk) ੦੧:੪੭, ੨੩ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Thanks kJ for your efforts but I wanna say an article to be featured must good in almost every sense, first of all written in good Punjabi and also from a neutral point of view, well sectionized, and specially, having very good lead section, well sourced and well wikilinked (I think interwikis shouldn't matter enough). We should find an article nearly fulfilling these needs and, as a featured article gonna set an example to users how a wiki article should be, so we must choose a featured article very wisely. Thank you. --tari Buttar (talk) ੦੨:੧੦, ੨੩ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Maybe we should all work on ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਬੋਲੀ, so that the first featured article will be the language that this wiki is written in. Also please have a look here to see a rough draft of what is aimed at being the main page, feel free to help translating! >>Zarienah (talk) ੦੭:੪੧, ੨੩ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Yes, Zarienah I support your proposal about ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਬੋਲੀ. And as of the draft, could you please remove the no edit section behavior switch as due to my device's lesser edit window support (5000 characters) I can't edit it better. Thank you. --tari Buttar (talk) ੦੮:੦੯, ੨੩ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

I'll do that, I don't know what it means but I just copied it from the Afrikaans Wiki's main page. >>Zarienah (talk) ੦੮:੧੯, ੨੩ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Admin's Star![ਸੋਧੋ]

		The Admin's Barnstar
		it's surprising that your works here have gone unrecognised, I Zarienah award this barnstar to TariButtar for all his contributions and endless administrative works that have helped this wiki make lots of progress, fellow editor and your well-wisher Zarienah (talk) ੨੧:੦੫, ੨੨ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

About Namibia page[ਸੋਧੋ]

Please see the discussion page of Namibia and make corresponding and necessary changes so that the page should be titled ਨਾਮੀਬੀਆ which are the correct spellings while ਨਾਮੀਬਿਆ should be redirected here and not the other way round.--Babanwalia (talk) ੦੮:੨੬, ੨੩ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Don't worry, I've joined the discussion; please carry on there. --tari Buttar (talk) ੦੮:੩੨, ੨੩ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Help[ਸੋਧੋ]

Could you please tell me how to make a new template? I want to add many templates in the existing or future pages I'm working on. Thanks!--Babanwalia (talk) ੦੯:੨੪, ੨੪ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Please check your talk page, I've replied there. --tari Buttar (talk) ੧੨:੩੬, ੨੪ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Articles[ਸੋਧੋ]

In my search for good content, it has come to my attention that there are many articles containing only one sentence or word, and others which are too long and untidily written and others that fail neutrality and the style guide. With you being the admin I request you to clean them out so this encyclopedia can be rewritten properly. >>Zarienah (talk) ੧੧:੧੫, ੨੪ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

So glad to hear from you on this must-discuss-and-fix, matter. I also had the same examination throughout the wiki and made efforts to edit them from a wikipedia style and also ask others. I also found some of them extremely short while others extremely long, repeating statements a lot, written untidily and many more issues. As of deleting (I assumed, by "clean" you mean "delete"?), I think, we can improve without deleting them but if you want to rewrite any particular in a better wiki style, I can delete it for you (anyway explain what you exactly suggesting). And, as of the one-sentenced articles, I seriously want them to be improved; we must encourage others to do so and must delete the extremely short articles lacking sufficient context to identify the article's subject and also that are created with just images like galleries. If you find any please tag them to be deleted using {{ਮਿਟਾਓ}} (click it for using instructions).

I don't know if it looks odd but suggest to have a "stub article/articles" (any appropriate name) section on the main page in which we can list or link one article choosen to be worked on (weekly). Anyway, it'll be nice to have your more valuable suggestions. Please discuss with me or even with the community how we can make improvements rehading them. Thanks for your hard work and a deep examination. --tari Buttar (talk) ੧੨:੧੪, ੨੪ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

I'll surely tag those articles for deletion, but for the others that are too long, untidy and fail neutral point, shouldn't there be a template to tag those with (and if there is please tell me what it is called). Also, we need a template to help us tag the articles that need to be rewritten(it will help the users to manage and work on this articles).. & thanks for all your replies and efforts to work with me! >>Zarienah (talk) ੨੦:੪੭, ੨੪ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

I found {{ਅੰਦਾਜ਼}} & {{ਉਦਾਸੀਨਤਾ}}, any others? >>Zarienah (talk) ੨੦:੫੨, ੨੪ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Yeah, there are also, {{ਛੋਟਾ}}, {{ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਨਹੀਂ}}, {{ਬੇ-ਹਵਾਲਾ}}, {{ਰਲਾਓ}} and also {{ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ}}, for files. Thanks for your idea for a template for long and untidy written articles, 'll be in the near future but also want your suggestions for that. Thank you! --tari Buttar (talk) ੦੧:੧੮, ੨੫ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

I've tagged some articles and will continue to do so, you may want to keep and eye on the delete category. Also if I have tagged an article inappropriately please notify me. Thanks! >>Zarienah (talk) ੧੮:੩੭, ੨੫ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Signatures[ਸੋਧੋ]

Please go to ਮੀਡੀਆਵਿਕੀ:Signature and change the „talk“ into „ਗੱਲ-ਬਾਤ“, --Zarienah ^{ਗੱਲ-ਬਾਤ • ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} ੧੯:੧੭, ੨੬ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

done - thanks for pointing out. --tari Buttar (talk) ੦੧:੧੫, ੨੭ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Spelling of Wikipedia[ਸੋਧੋ]

Sat Sri Akaal! I would like to bring up the issue with the spelling of Wikipedia, I think until this problem is fixed properly we should just keep using „ਵਿਕਿਪੀਡਿਆ“ because using „ਵਿਕੀਪੀਡੀਆ“ really doesn't look good and it creates confusions. Once the top-left hand corner image (image:Wiki.png) of the wiki has changed it's spelling and this wiki's official name is changed then it will be better to use „ਵਿਕੀਪੀਡੀਆ“ --Zarienah ^{ਗੱਲ-ਬਾਤ • ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} ੧੧:੩੧, ੨੭ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

State of the draft[ਸੋਧੋ]

Sat Sri Akaal! Please have a look at the draft of the main page, and give me a breakdown on what else needs to be done, thanks, --Zarienah ^{ਗੱਲ-ਬਾਤ • ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} ੧੬:੫੩, ੨੯ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

Blocking User[ਸੋਧੋ]

Saw you blocked a user without giving a warning or anything that is not what should happen it is usually 3 warnings before a block of any sort, your action is not justified. you should unblock and explain yourself to the user. --Zarienah ^{ਗੱਲ-ਬਾਤ • ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} ੧੮:੧੫, ੨੯ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)

It was twice I reverted their possible vandalised edits. Anyway, it was just for 2 hours and is already automatically unblocked. --tari Buttar (talk) ੦੦:੦੦, ੩੦ ਸਿਤੰਬਰ ੨੦੧੨ (UTC)